فصلنامه
نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک، اراک
2 استادیار، گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اراک
3 طلبه سطح سه حوزه علمیه استان مرکزی
4 مربی گروه معارف اسلامی دانشگاه اراک، اراک
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The topic of "Khalid" and eternal punishment for certain individuals in hell is a significant issue in exegesis and theology, consistently engaging Islamic thinkers. Within this discourse, opinions among Islamic scholars differ. Some argue that "Khalid" and eternal punishment are incompatible with God's justice, leading them to adopt the theory of "interruption of hell's punishment." Conversely, others assert that "Khalid" and eternal punishment do not contradict God's justice, thus affirming their belief in both concepts. Ayatollah Javas Amalia is among those who contend that "Khalid" and eternal punishment align with God's justice, offering rational justifications for the permanence of punishment for some individuals in hell. This research employs an analytical-descriptive method to evaluate and critique his rational arguments regarding "Khalid" and the permanence of torment. It concludes that these justifications fail to provide a rational explanation for the existence of "Khalid" in the Koranic context of punishment and do not resolve the tension between immortality and divine justice, despite the undeniable and certain nature of Koranic verses addressing "Khalid" and eternal punishment for certain individuals in hell.
کلیدواژهها English
